Prenatal and Birth Care of Roma Women

Fecha de publicación: Fecha Ahead of Print:

Autores de IDIVAL

  • María Paz Zulueta

    Autor

Autores ajenos al IDIVAL

  • Fernández-Feito A
  • Bueno-Pérez A
  • Díaz-Alonso J
  • Lana A

Unidades

Abstract

BackgroundThe reproductive health of Roma women has been poorly studied. It is important to determine the follow-up care received by Roma women from pregnancy to the first postpartum visit, together with neonatal outcomes, to improve prenatal care and maternal-child outcomes.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to examine differences in prenatal care and maternal-infant outcomes between Roma and non-Roma women.MethodsA retrospective longitudinal study was conducted in 122 pregnant women (28 Roma and 94 non-Roma women) recruited from seven primary care centers in three districts of Asturias (Spain). Sociodemographic variables, prenatal control, birth characteristics, feeding, and neonatal outcomes (gestational age, weight, and APGAR [appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration]) were collected from the electronic medical records. Prenatal care was assessed using three indices: the Kessner index, the Modified Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Spanish Index, and an ad hoc index that considered adherence to the recommendations for pregnant women in Spain.ResultsCompared with non-Roma women, advanced maternal age (>= 35 years) and primigravida were less common among Roma women. Roma women visited the dentist less often, smoked more, and underwent group B streptococcus screening less frequently. No differences were found in the number of prenatal visits between Roma and non-Roma women. Consequently, there were no differences between the Kessner index and the Modified Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Spanish Index. Using the ad hoc index, the non-Roma women more frequently had adequate prenatal visits. There were no differences in birth characteristics, type of feeding, and neonatal outcomes.DiscussionOverall, prenatal care was slightly worse in Roma women; however, this did not imply worse neonatal health outcomes. Both study groups had similar birth characteristics and immediate puerperium, including feeding.

Datos de la publicación

ISSN/ISSNe:
0029-6562, 1538-9847

NURSING RESEARCH  Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ltd.

Tipo:
Article
Páginas:
12-19
PubMed:
36096878

Documentos

  • No hay documentos

Métricas

Filiaciones mostrar / ocultar

Compartir